Legal Opinion

Benson v. Jones & Laughlin Ore Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1915No. Docket No. 64Published

Error to Iron; O’Brien, J. .Case by Ernest Benson against the Jones & Laughlin Ore Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In August, 1911, the defendant began to clear a location for iron ore operations. On December 7, 1911, it began to sink a perpendicular shaft *9to reach the ore body. It was necessary to sink the shaft to a depth of 175 feet before starting the first level. The plaintiff began work as a pumpman in the shaft about February 1, 1912. He claims to have been injured about February 14, 1912, while trying to climb out of the shaft. It is to recover damages for these injuries that he brought this suit. The plaintiff was a miner of about 14 years’ experience in Iron and Gogebic counties, and during that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bradburn v. Wabash RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Livingstone v. Saginaw Plate Glass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Kaaro v. Ahmeek Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. De Kallands v. Washtenaw Home Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dunn v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API