Huber v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hendricks Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
Huber, the appellant, was prosecuted and convicted in the Hendricks Common Pleas for keeping a nuisance.
The only question urged for the reversal of the judgment is as to the sufficiency of the information.
The information charged that said Huber, “on the 1st day of May, 1864, and on divers other days subsequent and prior to said day, was the owner and keeper of a business house in the town of Danville, Hendricks county, Indiana, wherein he kept for sale, and actually sold, intoxicating liquors in quantities to suit purchasers, to-wit: lager beer by the pint, half-pint, glass, &c. * * * * * And…
2Cited by7 opinions
- McLaughlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Donovan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. NeilonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. CambronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Hosea v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.