Crosby v. Cox Aircraft Company
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Callow, J. —
Quaere: Should owners and operators of flying aircraft be held strictly liable for ground damage caused by operation of the aircraft, or should their liability depend on a finding of negligence?
The trial court determined that strict liability was applicable and awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff landowners. We find that the general principles of negligence should control. We reverse and remand for trial.
I
The case involves a claim for property damage caused when a plane owned by Cox Aircraft Co. and piloted by Hal Joines (the pilot) crash-landed onto Douglas Crosby's…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Maitland v. Twin City Aviation Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1975
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Albin Dahlstrom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Hurley v. Port Blakely Tree Farms LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Stout v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2004
- Huddleston Ex Rel. Huddleston v. Union Rural Electric Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.