Legal Opinion

Richard W. Hobson v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1964No. 7657_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

By this application to the District Court for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner seeks to annul a state imposed sentence on the grounds that having been forcibly brought into the state for trial, his conviction violated due process of the Fourteenth Amendment.

This application was filed after similar application had been denied by the Kansas sentencing court, and appeal had failed otherwise than on its merits. The State suggests that other corrective process is available in the form of an original application to the Kansas Supreme Court; that petitioner has not, therefore, exhausted presently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. United States v. Aston Winter, Howard Charles Towne, Stanton Davis and William Michael ParksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. James Milton Cotten and William Lowell RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Pasquale Charles MarzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Edwin P. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API