Legal Opinion

Houston v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 18, 2003No. CA CR 02-817PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellant in this criminal case was charged with intentional adult abuse, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-28-103(b)(2) (Repl. 1997). After a bench trial, the trial judge announced that he found the evidence insufficient to prove intentional abuse, but found that appellant was guilty of committing negligent adult abuse in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-28-103(c)(2). For reversal, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction of negligent adult abuse. We cannot address this argument because it is raised for the first time on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grillot v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Cummings v. BoylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Dillard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Houston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API