Legal Opinion

Houston v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 18, 2003No. CA CR 02-817Published

1Opinion of the Court

120 S.W.3d 115 (2003)

Vivian S. HOUSTON

v.

STATE of Arkansas.

No. CA CR 02-817.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, IV.

June 18, 2003.

Alvin Schay, Little Rock, for appellant.

Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: David J. Davies, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellees.

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge.

The appellant in this criminal case was charged with intentional adult abuse, a violation of Ark.Code Ann. § 5-28-103(b)(2) (Repl.1997). After a bench trial, the trial judge announced that he found the evidence insufficient to prove intentional abuse, but found that appellant was guilty of committing…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grillot v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Ramaker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Cummings v. BoylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API