Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Wyatt

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 9, 1985PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice.

Jerome Kaplan, a shareholder of the Coastal Corporation (Coastal), appeals from the Court of Chancery’s decision in favor of Coastal’s Special Litigation Committee motion to dismiss Kaplan’s derivative suit. The primary issue on appeal is whether the Court of Chancery erred in its application of the guidelines for granting a corporation’s request to dismiss a derivative suit as set forth in this Court’s decision of Zapata v. Maldonado, Del.Supr., 430 A.2d 779 (1981). We conclude that the Court of Chancery correctly formulated and applied the guidelines of Zapata.

I

The factual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. United States v. Louis B. Pacheco and John N. Fountain, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Kaplan v. WyattCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1984

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. In Re ORACLE CORP DERIVATIVE LITIGATIONCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  4. Houle v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Kahn v. Kolberg Kravis Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API