Legal Opinion

Britt v. Britt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1975No. 7510SC133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The only question raised by plaintiff’s appeal is whether the. court properly allowed defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The purpose of the motion for summary judgment is to determine prior to trial whether there is any genuine issue, with respect to any material fact and, if not, to provide for an early and effective disposition of the matter.

“An issue is material if the facts alleged would constitute a legal defense, or would affect the result of the action, or if its resolution would prevent the party against whom it is resolved from prevailing in the action. The issue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Turner v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975
  3. Armenta v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Hodges v. WellonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Huggins v. DementCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Albemarle Realty & Mortgage Co. v. Peoples Bank of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Britt v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API