Cassell's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is a will contest. The main question presented is: Where a will is executed by mark, must the mark be placed on the paper after the subscription of the name? In this instance it may have been put on the document by the testatrix before. A subsidiary question is whether there was sufficient evidence by two witnesses of the testatrix’s direction to subscribe her name.
Section 3 of the Wills Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 403, 20 PS Sec. 192, reads as follows: “If the testator be unable to sign his name, for any reason other than the extremity of his last sickness,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schuetz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Scaife v. McKeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Brolasky's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Kelly's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Hill v. HouptSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Denlinger, Inc. v. DendlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Zummo v. ZummoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Scott EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Ehret EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Cohen WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.