Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. R.N.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
R.N. (mother) and E.T. (father) appeal from the order terminating their parental rights to daughters D.N. and A.T. The parents argue there is a lack of compliance with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 United States Code section 1901 et seq. (ICWA). We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the juvenile court’s determination that notice was proper and ICWA did not apply to this case. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude, among other things, that this court cannot override the Choctaw Nation’s determination that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Choctaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. GoldsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- People v. W.B.California Supreme Court · 2012
- In re E.W. v. V.P.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cherokee Nation v. NashDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Lydia O.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- In re Audrey H. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re K.C. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re Kayhlin W. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re S.J. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.