Legal Opinion
US Colloid Mill Corporation v. Myers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAPPEY, District Judge.
For convenience I shall refer to the so-called inventions mentioned in the applications described in paragraph 8 of the bill of complaint as if they were inventions in fact, although I shall not determine in this case whether they are inventions or not. That question is not before me.
As I have previously indicated to counsel, this is a contract suit. The primary issues are to determine whether or not the inventions, or any of them, come within the contract of June 15, 1928, between the plaintiff and Mr. Myers, and whether in other respects there has been proof entitling…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Temco Electric Motor Co. v. Apco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Watson Bros. Transp. Co. v. JaffaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Technitrol, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Hall v. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Hewett v. SAMSONITE CORPORATIONColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Quigley Pub. Co. v. Showmen's Round Table, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.