Legal Opinion

In re Silverman

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On review of decision of referee in bankruptcy disallowing claim of Nathan Kosenberg.

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

Nathan Kosenberg presented a claim against said estate for §1,200 for unliquidated damages growing out of a breach of contract. The referee having disallowed the claim, the controversy is before the court for review'. The controversy grows out of substantially the following state of facts: The bankrupts, Silverman Pros., were engaged in mercantile business in Kansas City, Mo., and for the year prior to September 6,1898, the claimant, Nathan Kosenberg, was in their employ on a salary of $15 per week. On September (5, 1898, Silverman Bros, executed the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harmony v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Tompkins v. . DudleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Lewis v. Atlas Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Boland v. Glendale Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. White v. MannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1846

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Southern Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1921
  2. Barnebey v. Barron G. Collier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Dycus v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. In re Big Meadows Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. In re D. Levy & Sons Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API