Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

PLYMOUTH INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Sioux Steel Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided October 17, 2006No. 8:05CV196, 8:05CV469Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STROM, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment of no inequitable conduct re: U.S. Patent No. 6,951,-189 filed by plaintiff and counterclaim defendant, Plymouth Industries, LLC, (“Plymouth”) (Filing No. 85 in 8:05CV196; Filing No. 63 in 8:05CV469) and the motion for summary judgment of unenforce-ability of U.S. Patent No. 6,951,189 for inequitable conduct filed by defendant and counterclaim plaintiff, Sioux Steel Company (“Sioux Steel”) (Filing No. 89 in 8:05CV196; Filing No. 69 in 8:05CV469). Having reviewed the motions, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API