Legal Opinion
O’neill v. Home IV Care, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 2002No. Docket 226428, 228162PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
Plaintiff Mary O’Neill appeals as of right from an order awarding her attorney fees, costs, and interest pursuant to MCL 15.364, § 4 of the Whistle-blowers’ Protection Act (wpa), MCL 15.361 et seq. Plaintiff disputes the amount of the award. Plaintiff also appeals as of right from a subsequent order awarding defendants attorney fees and costs as medi ation sanctions pursuant to MCR 2.403(0). We reverse and remand for a proper determination of plaintiffs attorney fees and costs pursuant to MCL 15.364, and we vacate, without prejudice, the award of mediation sanctions to defendants.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jenkins v. Southeastern Michigan Chapter, American Red CrossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Chandler v. Dowell Schlumberger Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lulaj v. Wackenhut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Theodore Cadwell v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Lulaj v. Wackenhut CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Theodore Cadwell v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Theodore Cadwell v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018