Walling v. Couch
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
As the facts of this cause are fully stated in the trial court’s order set forth in the dissent of Mr. Justice Jones, it is unnecessary to repeat them here.
The principal issue on this appeal is whether the Dead Man’s Statute, Title 7, § 433, Code of Alabama, as last amended, applies to protect those claiming through a deceased person by virtue of an inter vivos transaction. We hold that it does and reverse and remand the decree of the trial court in this cause.
In considering our case law on this point., we find there are two conflicting lines of cases. As noted in the dissent, the cases of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- McCulloch v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Goodgame v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Poston v. GaddisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Lappan v. LovetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Beddingfield v. Central Bank of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- DeShazo v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Kemp v. KroutterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.