Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1931No. 29,597PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action on a bond given by defendants

to secure county deposits in the Midwest State Bank of Fort Scott. The bank failed, and county funds amounting to $48,543.55 were not forthcoming on lawful demand. Since the bank failure, however, the county has received $12,149.60 in dividends, which reduced the alleged liability of defendants to $39,243.23 with interest, for which sum plaintiff prayed judgment.

The terms of the bond sued on read:

“Whereas, The Midwest State Bank of Fort Scott, Kan., a Kansas cor-' poration, desires to be a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bemis v. BeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  2. Mason v. McLeodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Pinney v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Morris v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Ridgway v. WetterholdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Roddy v. Hill Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Melton v. PrickettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Bradley v. MinorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. National Farmers Organization, Inc. v. Kinsley BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API