Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Miles

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 2004PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 Gregory Miles (“Miles”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed after he was convicted of robbery (two counts) and possession of an instrument of crime.1 We granted en banc review in this case to consider the issue raised by Miles’s second claim on appeal, i.e., whether, in light of Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002), we may address an issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal, where the ineffectiveness of counsel, or lack thereof, may be apparent on the record and where the trial court has addressed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. LilliockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StutlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Com. v. Burke, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Com. v. Cox, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Hill, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Hopkins, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API