Legal Opinion

Hutto v. South Bound R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 7, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before Gagl, J., Bamberg, April term, 1900. Action for damages for negligently killing Lucius Hutto, by Carrie Hutto, administratrix, against South Bound R. R. Co. From judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. cite: 25 S. C., 61; 52 S. C., 323; 58 S. C., 70, 222. The former cites-: 33 S. C., 138; 34 S. C., 299; 59 S. €., 87, 433.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered 'by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of nonsuit in an action for damages for wrongful act causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate. The “Case” states the following: “The testimony on the part of plaintiff showed that the deceased was -struck and killed by -a passing locomotive and train of cars -on defendant’s railroad, operated by the lessees of defendant, at a public crossing in Bamberg County, to wit: the crossing of the Barnwell and Bamberg public highway, one of the main thoroughfares of this county, on the night of September 20th,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chisolm v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Thompson v. RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. Scott v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Hasting v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
  5. McBride v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API