Hiller Cranberry Products, Inc. v. Koplovsky
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1DissentSelya, Circuit Judge
As the majority correctly notes, this appeal involves a difficult question of statutory construction that constitutes an issue of first impression in the federal courts. Because I read the statutory imperative differently than my colleagues, I respectfully dissent.
*11A core feature of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499e(c)(l)-(4) (Supp. II 1996) (PACA), impresses a trust in favor of the supplier of a covered agricultural commodity. Under the statute and the associated regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture, "that trust is superi- or to the interests of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.