Legal Opinion

Van Curon v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 1923No. 14239PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, 0.

Parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and will be referred to accordingly. In -1917, plaintiff sued Mrs. M. D. Walsh in the district court of Pontotoc county to foreclose mechanics’ lien on certain real estate belonging to her. During’ the same year she filed her answer and thereafter, on' her application, her tenants of the property were made parties defendant. Thereupon, she filed amended answer and cross-petition against her tenants. They answered the petition of plaintiff and the cross-petition of Mrs. Walsh. Before trial on the merits, and in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foreman v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Kilgore v. YarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Crites, Adm'x v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shefts v. Oklahoma Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Baldwin v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Welch v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Helms v. BulingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Hall v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API