Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Parra Perez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 2, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01224Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01224-AWI-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND 14 MARIA DEL CARMEN PARRA PEREZ, et al., (ECF No. 45) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Acosta’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for leave 19 to file a Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 46.) The motion is unopposed. The Court found 20 the matter suitable for decision without the need for oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) 21 and vacated the hearing on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.