Legal Opinion

Megadyne Medical Products v. Aaron Medical Industries

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 17, 1996No. 96-C-233 CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, Megadyne Medical Products, has made a motion for a jury trial. Plaintiffs suit is based on a claim that it is the holder of a patent for a surgical knife and that the defendant Aaron Medical Industries has infringed the patent. The suit seeks damages and equitable relief for the alleged infringement. The plaintiff did not make a jury demand with its complaint or request a jury within the time required by Rule 38, F.R.C.P. At the time of initial pretrial on September 5,1996 the plaintiff became aware of the fact that it had not requested a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006