Legal Opinion

McInnish v. Lanier

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1926No. 5 Div. 952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotjldin, J.

The suit is in assumpsit on the common counts. Among the pleas interposed in bar was an arbitration and award upon the matter in, suit.

An agreement by parol to submit to arbitrators agreed upon by the parties matters not required by law to be evidenced by writing, followed by a hearing of the evidence offered by the parties, a present decision by the arbitrators upon the matters submitted, and the verbal announcement of such decision to the parties, is a good common-law award. Byrd v. Odem, 9 Ala. 755, 766.

The award must be a final determination of the matters submitted. If any further action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byrd v. OdemSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  2. McCrary v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  3. Mason v. BullockAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  2. Mercury Oil Refining Co. v. Oil Workers International Union, CIO Oil Workers International Union, CIO v. Mercury Oil Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  3. Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1976
  5. Wright v. Land Developers Construction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API