Legal Opinion · Dissent

Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. Zavaleta

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 5, 1992No. 13-90-215-CVPublished

1DissentNye, Chief Justice

I dissent from the majority's opinion. The majority reversed this case on the basis that the “evidence is insufficient to show that B.P.I. and Meszaros desired to have Zavaleta indicted in this instance and that the answer of the jury was so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be incorrect.” In arriving at this conclusion, the majority has not followed the guidelines set down by our Supreme Court which are to be used when reversing a case based upon insufficient evidence.

The procedure which an appellate court must follow when analyzing a factual insufficiency…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Akin v. DahlTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Marathon Oil Co. v. Salazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API