Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Fleury
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of Wayne and Betty Fleurys motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1) of their claims against Dean Witter. We vacate the district court’s order and remand with instructions to dismiss Dean Witter’s complaint and compel arbitration before the NASD.
I. BACKGROUND
Wayne and Betty Fleury opened a securities account at Dean Witter in 1982. Upon opening the accounts, the Fleurys signed a “Customer Agreement” containing this arbitration clause:
Any controversy between you [Dean Witter]…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Piggly Wiggly Operators' Warehouse, Inc. v. Piggly Wiggly Operators' Warehouse Independent Truck Drivers Union, Local No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- McMullen v. McMullenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
3Cited by23 opinions
- JPay, Inc. v. Cynthia KobelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Salomon Smith Barney Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, MDCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. LeggettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ernst & Young, LLP v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Frank v. American General Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.