City of Los Angeles v. A.E.C. Los Angeles, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
In this appeal from a judgment in favor of the City of Los Angeles (City) for amounts found due to it from appellant A.E.C. Los Angeles (Taxpayer) for business tax, Taxpayer contends: (1) it is immune from municipal taxation measured by gross receipts on its business conducted with agencies of the State of California; and (2) recovery of taxes for the years 1962 and 1963 is barred by the statute of limitations.
The City of Los Angeles is a freeholders’ charter city. Section 21.03 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code provides: “(a) Subject to the provisions of this Article, a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marsh & McLennan of California, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- The Pines v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Board of Trustees v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- City of S.F. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Times Mirror Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.