Legal Opinion

State v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 6, 2012No. 104,697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atcheson, J.:

In this case, the court must address the constitutionality of a sentence potentially subjecting Defendant Daniel Proctor to lifetime postrelease supervision and, in turn, to imprisonment for life without parole if he were later to commit any felony, including a property crime otherwise calling for probation. Proctor faces that prospect because he pled guilty to a sex offense — aggravated indecent solicitation of a child — for which he has received a permissible guideline sentence of probation. For Proctor, a man in his early 20’s, the statutory sentencing scheme could put him…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DullSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. RiffeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. RiffeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API