State v. Proctor
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Atcheson, J.:
In this case, the court must address the constitutionality of a sentence potentially subjecting Defendant Daniel Proctor to lifetime postrelease supervision and, in turn, to imprisonment for life without parole if he were later to commit any felony, including a property crime otherwise calling for probation. Proctor faces that prospect because he pled guilty to a sex offense — aggravated indecent solicitation of a child — for which he has received a permissible guideline sentence of probation. For Proctor, a man in his early 20’s, the statutory sentencing scheme could put him…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DullSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. RiffeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. RiffeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018