Legal Opinion

Mark Robbins v. Randy Becker, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2013No. 12-3113PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

This interlocutory appeal arises out of the district court’s denial of summary judgment on defendants’, Missouri State Highway Patrol Officers’ (officers), qualified immunity defenses to the plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2, claims. The officers contend we should address the merits of their qualified immunity defenses. We decline to do so. Following our well established precedents, “we remand because the [district court’s] analysis [denying summary judgment] is so scant that we are unable to discern if the district court even applied both steps…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cody Walton v. Robert DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Elaine Thompson v. Ulenzen KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. Mark Robbins v. Randy Becker, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Ron Nord v. Walsh CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. David Roberts v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API