Legal Opinion

Petrichko v. Kurtz

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-2790PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOWELL A. REED, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Daniel Scott Petrichko brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Defendants have moved for summary judgment under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Document No. 40). For the following reasons, the motion of defendants will be denied.

Introductory Facts 1

Petrichko, who was a prisoner at the Schuylkill County Prison, was playing basketball at the prison on July 30, 1997, when another inmate shoved him into a steel pole, dislocating his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Durr v. SlatorDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
  2. Kristich v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
  3. SABETPOUR v. MARTINEZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  4. WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API