(PC) McClintock v. Valencia
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN SCOTT McCLINTOCK, No. 2:21-cv-0850-TLN-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 G. VALENCIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After the dismissal of his original complaint on screening1 (ECF Nos. 1 & 10), 19 plaintiff has filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 13), which the court must now screen. As 20 discussed below, plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend for failure to 21…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Brodheim v. CryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- David K. Huskey v. City of San Jose Joan Gallo George Rios Ralph GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.