Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Two Columbus Avenue Condominium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Condominium defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the actions they took to remedy the water infiltration problems in plaintiffs’ condominium unit were taken “in good faith and in the exercise of honest judgment in the lawful and legitimate furtherance of corporate purposes” (Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp., 75 NY2d 530, 538 [1990]).

Plaintiffs’ private nuisance claim against the Sponsor was properly dismissed since plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the Sponsor engaged in intentional and unreasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v. StavitskyNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Pelton v. 77 Park Avenue CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Clark v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Joseph v. NRT Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karydas v. Ferrara-RuurdsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Huang v. Fort Greene Partnership Homes CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API