State ex rel. Sorrells v. Mosier Tree Service
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The sole issue presented for resolution herein is whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion when it denied the application for an additional award. See State, ex rel. Ruggles, v. Stebbins (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 228, and cases cited therein.
In interpreting Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-19-02 (formerly IC-19-02), the Industrial Commission determined that it “does not apply to this employer and the work in which this employer was engaged * * * .” This interpretation appears reasonable. Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-19-01 (B) provides that “[t]he terms used in these rules shall be interpreted in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Ruggles v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Development Authority v. Beverly EnterprisesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- State v. Jacksonville Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Parks v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Devore Roofing & Painting v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.