Legal Opinion

Dombrowski v. Pfister

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1964No. Civ. A. 14019PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK B. ELLIS, District Judge.

This is a suit by James A. Dombrow-ski, Executive Director of Plaintiff Southern Conference Educational Fund, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the SCEF) and the SCEF seeking to have declared unconstitutional LSA-Revised Statutes, Title 14, Sections 358 through 388, referred to as the Subversive Activities and Communist Control Law, and LSA-Revised Statutes, Title 14, Sections 390 through 390.5, referred to as the Communist Propaganda Control Law.

The alleged purpose of the SCEF is to (1) promote the general welfare, and (2) to improve the economic, social and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  4. Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API