Legal Opinion

Miller v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1937No. 33,488PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*482The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This was an action by the county engineer of Ottawa county against the board of county commissioners of that county upon a contract to recover a balance of $50 per month for ten months, or $500, for unpaid salary agreed to have been paid to the county engineer by the board at the rate of $200 per month for one year.

The plaintiff introduced his evidence as to such contract and the amounts paid, leaving such balance, the most of such evidence being by stipulation. It was also stipulated that the reason the county board had reduced the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hall v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Gray v. CrockettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. State ex rel. Boynton v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Durflinger v. ArtilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Durflinger v. ArtilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Durflinger v. ArtilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Griggs v. Harding CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. John E. Kirchner v. The Kansas Turnpike AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API