Legal Opinion

Burkhardt v. Elgee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix county: E. B. Bundy, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 10, 1896:

Winslow, J.

This is an action of trespass for entering the lands of the plaintiffs, and unlawfully, with hook and line, catching from the Willow river, a stream which flows through said lands, certain brook trout. The damages were laid at $100 in the complaint, but it appeared on the trial that the damages for the trespass were simply nominal, and that the brook trout caught were of the value of fifty cents only. Trial by jury was waived, and the entry and catching of the fish were admitted. The court found from the evidence, among other things,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Hilton v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Kolb v. BankheadTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Knapp v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilbert Co. v. HustedWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Henk v. BaumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Blonde v. Menominee Bay Shore Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Burkhardt v. ElgeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API