Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

In the case of Haakensen v. Company, 76 N. H. 443, on which' the plaintiff relies, liability is held to depend on whether the employer undertakes to furnish his workmen a complete staging or leaves to them the task of preparing the structure for their own use. In the one instance the master’s duty is a non-delegable one; in the other, his only obligation is to provide proper materials for the erection of the structure and to employ competent men to do the work.

There was evidence in the Haakensen case that the defendant intrusted to its carpenters the duty of building all stagings on which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garrow v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  2. Rihmann v. George J. Grant Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Jennings v. Iron Bay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. PietkevichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  2. Ireland v. E. J. Pinney, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  3. Martin v. KimballSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API