McIntyre v. McIntyre
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
In the case of Haakensen v. Company, 76 N. H. 443, on which' the plaintiff relies, liability is held to depend on whether the employer undertakes to furnish his workmen a complete staging or leaves to them the task of preparing the structure for their own use. In the one instance the master’s duty is a non-delegable one; in the other, his only obligation is to provide proper materials for the erection of the structure and to employ competent men to do the work.
There was evidence in the Haakensen case that the defendant intrusted to its carpenters the duty of building all stagings on which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garrow v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- Rihmann v. George J. Grant Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Jennings v. Iron Bay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lucas v. PietkevichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Ireland v. E. J. Pinney, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Martin v. KimballSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939