Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Newell v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 28, 2013No. 12-2984, 12-3894PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
Fredrick Newell brought this action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (“FCA”), on behalf of the United States against the City of St. Paul. Newell alleged that, from 2003 through 2009, the City obtained grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) by falsely certifying compliance with Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 and its applicable regulations. See 12 U.S.C. § 1701u; 24 C.F.R. § 135 (collectively “Section 3”). The government declined to intervene in Newell’s “qui tam ” 1 action. The district court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Glaser v. Wound Care Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Ambrosecchia v. Paddock Laboratories, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- John Schedin v. Ortho-McNeil-JanssenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Donegan v. Anesthesia Associates of Kansas City, PCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- U.S. ex rel. Kathi HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Sprint Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.