Jones v. Bradford
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hubbard county to recover a balance of $233.10 and interest for goods sold and delivered and money advanced. The case was tried before Holland, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $318.38. From a judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Action to recover for money advanced and for goods sold and delivered to defendant by plaintiff’s assignor. Defense, that the goods were purchased by defendant as the agent for and on account of one James Billings, and that the same had been. paid. Verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial. There are two assignments of error. ■
1. Plaintiff called the defendant for cross-examination, under the statute (G-. S. 1894, § 5659), and by him identified an instrument, *397Exhibit A, proved the signature, and then asked this question: “In fulfilment of that, plaintiff’s…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Combs v. YoungeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
- Olson v. AuboleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Miller v. CarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905