Legal Opinion

Coleman v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1988No. 16767PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a prison policy which prohibits an inmate’s access to the law library passes constitutional muster. The district judge held that a ten-day restriction on access to a law library, applicable only to those prisoners who receive disciplinary detention, is facially invalid because it abridges the fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts. We affirm.

Respondent Andrew Coleman is incarcerated at the Idaho State Correctional Institution (ISCI). On October 3, 1985, he was confined to thirty days in disciplinary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Evensiosky v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lopez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Freeman v. Idaho Department of CorrectionIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Waggoner v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API