Legal Opinion

Spackman v. Spackman

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1979No. 50,031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Parks, J.:

Thelma Spackman, defendant wife, appeals from a trial court order which (1) awarded Wayne Spackman, plaintiff husband, one-half of her replacement housing supplemental payment, (2) retroactively relieved plaintiff of the duty to pay two months past due child support, (3) retroactively credited plaintiff with payment of five months unpaid alimony by deducting $2,500 from plaintiff’s alleged share of the replacement housing supplemental payment, and (4) ordered that defendant either pay the $2,575 balance of plaintiff’s alleged share of the housing supplemental payment directly to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DIVISION OF ADMIN., ETC. v. Grant Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Salem v. SalemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Louisiana Department of Highways v. ColemanDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte County/Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Langmade v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Nielsen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Karen Y. Nielsen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  5. Nielsen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API