Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, II. & D. R. v. Van Horne

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1895No. 306PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of (he Southern District of Ohio. This was an action by Stephen A. Van Horne against the Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad Company for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the circuit court. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

Tliis is a proceeding in error to review the judgment of the circuit court for the Southern district of Ohio in favor of Stephen A. Van Horne for $1,000. The plaintiff was a switchman in the employ of the defendant in its yards at Ivorydale, Ohio, in September, 1890. In the discharge of his duties Ms foot was caught in a guard rail on the track of the defendant company in such a way that he was unable to extricate himself before he was struck by a locomotive. His foot was torn from the shoe which he had on, and luckily was not caught under the wheels, but a bone in his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Readman v. ConwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  4. Wheeler v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. Green v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Erie R. Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Davidson S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Lake Erie & W. Ry. Co. v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API