D. M. v. Or. Health Auth.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.
*399Petitioner seeks review, pursuant to ORS 183.482, of a final order in a contested case by the Oregon State Hospital. The issue, as it turns out, is jurisdiction: Do we have jurisdiction under the Administrative Procedures Act to review an agency order that has been withdrawn? We conclude that we do not and, therefore, dismiss.
Petitioner was committed to the state hospital under ORS 161.370, because she had been charged with crimes but was not fit to proceed. Once there, the hospital determined that petitioner was gravely disabled and was unable to give informed consent to the course of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Knapp v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Haskell Corp. v. FilippiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Voelz Oil & Land Survey, Inc. v. Oregon State Fire MarshalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995