Gomez v. Snyder Ranch
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
From a judgment awarding a minor dependent weekly benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, defendants appeal raising four issues, each of which they claim require reversal. Because it is dis-positive of this appeal, we address only one issue: what is the domicile of a child not yet born at the time of his parent’s injury under the Workmen’s Compensation Act? We hold that the child’s domicile is the domicile of the parent with whom he resides at the time of his birth. Because that domicile was outside the United States, we reverse.
On March 19, 1981, while employed as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pedrazza v. Sid Fleming Contractor, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Worland v. WorlandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Neeley v. Union Potash & Chemical Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Ranger Insurance Co. v. ValerioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Gallup American Coal Co. v. LiraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Adoption of Baby ChildNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985