Hopper v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
GARRITY, Judge.
“The partiality of a witness is subject to exploration at trial, and is always relevant as discrediting the witness and affecting the weight of his testimony.” 1
In this matter we are asked to determine whether the trial judge abused his discretion in curtailing the cross-examination of a victim as to his pecuniary interest to falsify testimony in order to keep an award of $2,698.19 he had received from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.
Appellant Gary Lee Hopper, an admitted male prostitute, had been charged by indictment with assault with intent to murder, assault with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Hemingway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.