United States v. Harmison
District Court, D. Oregon
[This was an indictment against Andrew J. Harmison. upon the charge of knowingly receiving gold dust stolen from the mails.J Motion to have the defendant’s sentence reconsidered, and the measure of punishment readjusted.
1Opinion of the Court
DEADT, District Judge.
Late in the evening of Tuesday, December 21, the defend-, ant was found guilty of embezzling a mail pouch from the United States mail on the stage between Roseburg and Levins’ station, in Southern Oregon, and stealing three cans of gold dust therefrom. On the next mom-, ing the case of the United States against this defendant and Sarah J. Montgomery, for receiving the same dust, knowing it to have been so stolen, was called for trial. [Case No. 15.800.] The defendant then asked leave to withdraw his plea of not guilty to the second indictment and plead autrefois convict…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- In re BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Rose ex rel. Carter v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
- State v. NaylorDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.