Legal Opinion

Cox v. Bowles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 4, 1927No. 17496PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, 0.

Plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs in the trial court, sought an injunction against the di fondants in er- or, as defendants, as county superintendents of public instruction of Tulsa and Pawnee counties, respectively, restraining and enjoining said defendants from putting into operation and effect, a certain order theretofore made by such county superintendents and published, changing the boundaries of joint district. No. 2, Tulsa county* pursuant to request of a large number of householders in said joint district No. 2, Tulsa county, and district No. 57. Pawnee county.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stringer v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API