Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Pearl

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1963No. Crim. 3332PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Defendants, Harold Pearl and Robert Kennedy, appeal from judgments of conviction entered after a jury found them guilty of the crimes of abortion and murder of the second degree.

Upon Pearl’s request for counsel this court appointed Rudolf H. Binsch, Esq., to represent him on this appeal. Mr. Binsch has advised the court that he finds no valid grounds for an appeal and no brief has been filed on behalf of appellant Pearl, but a brief has been filed by the attorney for appellant Kennedy which to some extent applies also to the appeal of Pearl.

Kennedy makes a number of major contentions in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. AlcaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CugliataSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. People v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. La PelusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. BrysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API