Legal Opinion

People v. Bryson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1967No. Crim. 363PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The defendants, Samuel L. Bryson and Jesse Jackson, were both convicted of burglary. There is no question but that the residence of Charles W. Hasenkamp, on the outskirts of Merced, was burglarized or that a radio and television were feloniously removed from his house by someone or that these articles were found by peace officers in the pickup truck of Bryson which, with him present, had been driven, off and on, for hours by Jackson. Initially, there was a question, however, whether either of the defendants was guilty of the crime. The jury found that both were guilty.

Some of the essential…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. VillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. People v. CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API