Legal Opinion

Kenyon v. Hammer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5518PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*125OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

The issue before us in this medical malpractice action is whether the case was properly dismissed on the grounds that the statute of limitations barred the plaintiffs’ claims. We find that the claims were not barred and reverse the judgment of the trial' court.

Appellant Sharon Kenyon first became pregnant in 1971, and was unden the care of Appellee Dr. Hammer from November, 1971, until her delivery on July 10, 1972. During the course of Mrs. Kenyon’s pregnancy, a blood sample was drawn. A laboratory report clearly indicated that she had type A, Rh negative blood. A nurse…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clark v. SingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. United States v. Wilroy ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Mayer v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Landgraff v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Fernandez v. RomoArizona Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API