Schuldt v. Ness
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PORTER, Justice (on reassignment).
This case involves sale of realty to appellants by an estate Executrix under a power of sale in a will. The issue presented is whether refusal of the trial court to confirm the sales made by the Executrix constituted an abuse of discretion. Each appeal is from an order dated October 10, 1975, in which the trial court confirmed sales of the realty involved to the respondents, who were the high bidders at the October 10th confirmation hearing. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm each order confirming sale.
Appellants contend that “[AJbsent any showing by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chipperfield v. WoessnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Kent v. Dakota Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Hardman v. LasellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Sampson v. ExonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Shearn v. FentonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of AssmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977